Pennridge Board votes 7-2 to allow restorative justice in schools

The Pennridge School Board split on Monday, October 26, when it approved a new student-discipline policy that introduces restorative practices. The vote passed 7-2, signaling a shift toward conflict resolution methods alongside traditional punishments. The board authorized administrators to use these tools to address student behavior.

Restorative practices focus on repairing relationships and solving problems. They include conferences, peer mediation, and problem-solving circles. These options serve as alternatives to detention, suspension, and expulsion. The policy does not remove traditional consequences but adds a new layer to the administrative toolkit.

Board member Carly Taylor clarified the scope of the change during the meeting. She stated that restorative justice sessions do not replace standard discipline. Taylor noted that application remains at the discretion of the administration team. She emphasized that the board is providing a new tool rather than a mandate for every situation.

Director of Student Services Ernest Johnson outlined a training plan for staff during earlier committee discussions. Training will be conducted through the Bucks County Intermediate Unit this winter. Implementation of the new policy is scheduled for the 2027-28 school year. This timeline allows staff to complete necessary preparation before the rules take effect.

The two dissenting votes came from members Thomas Trauger and Brian McMullen. Both expressed support for the concept but raised procedural concerns. Trauger argued that staff should complete training before the board approves the policy. He stated that staff need the necessary tools prior to policy approval to ensure proper implementation.

McMullen called for a basic implementation plan that aligns restorative practices with existing disciplinary procedures. He expressed a preference for getting the process right the first time. Both members voted against the measure while acknowledging the potential benefits of the new approach. Their comments highlighted the administrative complexity of the transition.

The board also expanded its authority to discipline students for specific off-campus behavior. This applies when the behavior has a direct connection to school attendance, the school community, or a school-sponsored activity. Administrators previously cited vandalism at a staff member’s home, cyberbullying, and fights planned outside school hours as examples of such conduct.

Public comment also addressed the proposal to close South Middle School. The plan would consolidate three middle schools into two starting in 2028-29. Administrators selected South Middle School due to its low enrollment and aging facilities. A 2017 study projects the closure will save an estimated $3.3 million annually. Enrollment at the remaining schools would rise to roughly 700 students each. A planning committee will present findings to the board in January, with a final decision expected in April.